The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Essay -- students, academic progre

On January 8, 2002, President George Bush signed into law The No Child Left Behind operation of 2001, which was a reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which was designed to help disadvantaged students achieve success in school (Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, 2011) The components of The No Child Left Behind included annual testing, academic progress, report cards, teacher qualifications, and funding changes. These measures were designed to drive broad gains in student consummation and to hold states and schools more accountable for student progress (Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, 2011, para. 3). NCLB also promised to close the achievement gap and increase student study (Hursh 2007). By the grade 2005-2006, the states were required to assess all students annually in grades 3-8, and these tests had to be aligned with the state standards (Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, 2011). In addition, a representative sam ple of 4th graders and 8th graders had to participate in National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) testing program in order to be compared to other students nationally (Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, 2011). For a school to meet academic progress, certain subgroups and the school has a whole had to make decorous yearly progress. If the school failed to make AYP, so the school could receive supplemental services and parents could send their kidren to another school. If the school continued to not make AYP, then the school could receive punitive government sanctions. Teachers had to be deemed highly qualified in their subject matter, and school report cards had to be released each year to illustrate student achievement data and scho... ...lenge them as well as help them to learn, the students are able to achieve academic progress.ReferencesDee, B. and Jacob, T.S. (2011). The impact of no child left behind on student achievement.Journal of Policy Analysis an d Management, 30 (3), 418446. Retrieved fromhttp//deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/86808/20586_ftp.pdf?sequence=Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. (2011, kinfolk 19). Issues A-Z No Child Left Behind. Education Week. Retrieved from http//www.edweek.org/ew/issues/no-child-left-behind/Hursh, D. (2007 September). Exacerbating inequality The failed promise of the no child left behind act. Race, Ethnicity, and Education.10 (3), 295-308. Retrieved from http//www.wou.edu/girodm/foundations/Hursh.pdf Tatum, A. (2006) Engaging African-american males in reading. Educational Leadership, 63(5), 44-49.